#Github workspaces full

They may or may not haver used the API, and will likely possess different levels of experience when it comes to using GitHub. Once I open up my GitHub workspace to other developers I canвЂ™t expect all of them to be equipped when it comes to making sense of the vast landscape of the GitHub Web API or the GitHub GraphQL API. These GitHub API reference collections become the seeds for the rest of my GitHub API awareness, informing what is possible when it comes to leverae=ging GitHub as part of my underlying API infrastructure. I use these reference documentation to learn about the surface area of the GitHub APIs, then use the to remix on-boarding, workflow, and other types of collections that help me integrate, automate, and orchestrate using the API.

#Github workspaces full

Upon entering my API workspaces I like having a full menu of the GitHub resources available to me. I will be honest, this is that robust yet, as I need to understand more about how you make GraphQL SDL more tangible using docs, making it something you can see. Generating a collection for all of the 623 API methods available in the OpenAPI, providing a complete menu of what is possible with the GitHub API. I have that for GitHub, providing any developer within my API workspace to see the full menu of what is possible with both of the GitHub APIs.

The place most Postman users start when it comes to generating Postman collections from OpenAPI or GraphQL is some sort of reference collection that details everything that is going on with an API. It is my job to help Postman customers and partners understand what is possible when it comes to producing on-boarding, reference, workflow, and other types of collections-this is where things begin to get really good, and actually reduce friction for developers. However, both of these require you to be fluent in OpenAPI and / or GraphQL to be able to get what you want out of the GitHub API. These two API contracts provide me with a machine readable description of what is possible when it comes to working with the GitHub API.

GotJib v4 GraphQL - I pulled the schema definition language (SDL) for the GitHub GraphQL, and published it as an API, which I can then use to generate collections-there is only a single endpoint, but still provides me with a base.

GitHub V3 OpenAPI - GitHub maintains an OpenAPI definition for their web API, allowing anyone to use as the base for generating docs, mocks, tests, and integrate, automate, and orchestrate across the API lifecycle.

Providing me with the base for all of the collections I am generating, evolving, and making work for me when integrating, automating, and orchestrating with the GitHub API. While I have many orphan API collections laying around in workspaces, my more robust workspaces tend to leverage OpenAPI as the truth of each API, but with the GitHub API I have the opportunity to provide both an OpenAPI and GraphQL API side by side in a single workspace. In an effort to continue showcasing t he importance of having a diverse API toolbox, I wanted to take a walk through my GitHub API workspace, which I use personally, but wanted to take a spin through it to help polish some of the rougher edges of my approach, before I invite some other team members to use my workspace. When in reality they are both very useful patterns that API providers and consumers should be aware of, and possess in their API toolboxes. GraphQL folks love to say it is a replacement for REST, and the RESTafarians love to point out GraphQLвЂ™s weaknesses. Like other successful API patterns REST and GraphQL have been in competition for mindshare since GraphQL emerged on the landscape. A Diverse API Workspace Example Using OpenAPI and GraphQL From GitHub